赵 蕊,姚 祎.中外极深地下科学实验室建设比较研究[J].安徽建筑大学学报,2017,25(4): |
中外极深地下科学实验室建设比较研究 |
A Comparative Study of Construction Deep Underground Science Laboratories’ in China and Foreign Countries |
|
DOI:10.11921/j.issn.2095-8382.20170416 |
中文关键词: 极深地下科学实验室 地下空间 比较研究 |
英文关键词: deep underground science laboratory underground space comparative study |
基金项目:1、安徽省教育厅人文社科重点课题:Sk2015A313;2、安徽省高等学校省级教学研究项目:2014jyxm265 |
|
摘要点击次数: 7418 |
全文下载次数: 0 |
中文摘要: |
极深地下科学实验室是国家科技发展水平的基本标志,也是地下空间开发利用的重要方向,实施中外极深地下实验室比较研究意义重大。课题组在介绍全球深层地下实验室建设概况的基础上,通过LNGS、DUSEL与CJPL建设相关信息比较,发现中外极深地下实验室规划选址在废弃矿井或交通隧道中、规划设计将地下环境与实验需求结合起来、功能定位须准确并兼顾后续发展、立项和审批程序体现国情特色等规律,希望为国内极深地下科学实验建设的提供借鉴和启示。 |
英文摘要: |
Deep underground science laboratory is the basic symbol of level of national science and technology development, and it is also an important direction for the development and utilization of underground space. It is important to carry out a comparative study of Chinese and foreign deep underground laboratories. Based on the introduction of global deep underground laboratory construction, the research group compared construction information of the LNGS, DUSEL and CJPL, and found that the site of deep underground science laboratory was located in the abandoned mine or traffic tunnel, the planning and the design must consider the underground environment and experimental needs, the functional positioning should be accurate and take into account the follow-up development, the project's approval procedures reflect characteristics of the national conditions and other laws. we hope that it can provide reference and inspiration for the Chinese deep underground scientific experimental construction. |
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
关闭 |